I have a company who is constructing a building in their own name. They have arranged contract works insurance, but have also asked about defective workmanship. As the building is owned by them, I advised they could not have a liability cover as they cannot hold themselves liable. They have since been advised they should form a new company and that new company could then "own" the building from construction onwards and thus their existing liability would cover them as they are not the same insured. I do not believe that the insurer would accept this as both companies would have common directors and shareholders. What is the legal stance on this?
Reply: Crossley Gates
In short, that sounds like a scheme to hoodwink the liability insurer.
While each company is a separate legal entity, and therefore one of them can be liable to the other, the whole arrangement creates a false liability if both companies are effectively owned and controlled by the same people.
One of the foundations of insurance is the honesty of all parties.
Professional IQ College offers workshops, online courses, webinars and qualifications.
For upcoming events:
Where members can access industry Resources & Media Content